Muammar Gaddafi was a great revolutionary in his time, he seized power in a bloodless military coup, until 2011 when his government was overthrown in a civil war which consisted of a popular uprising aided by a NATO intervention.
The above statement is almost a copy/paste of the wikipedia page, which you can find here:
Everybody has some sort of believe that he was the man behind the Lockerbie terrorist act, but its disputed to this day as much as the theory of the Big Bang. So why is that?
If you want to get to the bottom of the event, you can start here:
SourceLIE: Gaddafi was responsible for the Lockerbie Bombing
Libya and Gaddafi was FRAMED for the Lockerbie Bombing. END OFF. This was probably one of the EARLIEST LIES to frame Gaddafi and socially engineer the public’s perception of him.
This is based on the premise that key evidence presented at the trial (e.g. timer fragment, parts from a specific radio cassette model, clothing bought in Malta, bomb suitcase originating at Luqa Airport) was deliberately fabricated by the U.S. and Britain for the "political" purpose of incriminating Libya.
Because of all the reasons stated above and below. Libya was bad for Big business and Big Banking, so something had to be done – like the Lockerbie Bombing, so that lies could be fabricated and Gaddafi could be demonised over the years until his death.
Even though Gaddafi was never involved in the Lockerbie Bombing, recently the mainstream media is jumping around the fact that he somehow “was”.
Who was Muammar Gaddafi?
Let me start on a page that cought my eye:After seizing power in 1969, he abolished the Libyan Constitution of 1951. He established laws based on the political ideology he had formulated, called the Third International Theory and published in The Green Book.
Rising oil prices and extraction in Libya led to increasing revenues. By exporting as much oil per capita as Saudi Arabia, Libya achieved the highest living standards in Africa
Memory of GaddafiLIE: “The people of Libya were oppressed and were living in poverty under Gaddafi’s rule”
This lie is probably the funniest, and the easiest to debunk.
There was very little poverty (almost compared to Western standards) and Libya had literally the best living standards in Africa ranking 55th out of 172 countries (before NATO and Rebel interference) according to the Human Development Index - 0.755
The people in Libya under Gaddafi’s rule had:
Free health care,
Free farmland a house and seeds,
Free energy bills,
$50,000 housing money for just married couples,
Interest free loans,
Debt free country,
Government pays half for your car,
Near free gasoline prices
The people in Libya were oppressed? This country sounds like the American dream which the people of America never had!
And just to note, almost EVERY country in Africa today is dependent on Foreign Aid, except Libya (during Gaddafi's rule).
This is almost identical to the Grand Chessboard written by Zbigniew Brzezinski, and which Michael Ruppert warned about Michael C. Ruppert
I dont believe in prophecies, but imho, Michael Ruppert got it right.
Then again, Gadaffi was Gaddafi put on display in shopping center freezer
(Thanks to Doc for the link)
How humane and democratic is that ?
Its al about middle east domination. Nations are toppling one after the other, and the idea is that when it gets started, they will all fall. The grand idea is to get the remaining oil. Who thinks for a second that Nato or the worlds largest military power, the US military, is not dominated by oil?
Planes trains and automobiles was a fun movie, but it also stated some facts about the western living as a whole. It don't work without oil. Actually, this post was probably forwarded by a server somewhere in the world where the energy was oil.
Also ask yourself, why did Muammar Gaddafi held on to his colonel status? He could at any time rose to a General, or President, but he didnt
Welcome to the Grand Chess Board!
So what is the next move ?